Mychal Richardson

Mychal Richardson: What Sitting on Both Sides of the Table Taught Me About Raising Capital

Most founders think the hardest part of raising capital is finding the right investor. It is not. The hardest part is showing up prepared enough that the investor has nothing left to say “no” to. Mychal Richardson, Principal at Senzu Partners, works with founders, funds, and family offices on inorganic growth, capital placement, and strategic partnerships. 

Having operated on both sides of these conversations long enough to recognize the patterns that determine outcomes, he has a direct view of why raises fail. “Most raises don’t fail because the opportunity was bad,” Richardson states. “They fail because the founder didn’t understand how capital actually gets allocated.”

Investors Fund Pattern Matches, Not Ideas

Every serious investor operates from a mental model, a picture of what a winning opportunity looks like at a specific stage, sector, team profile, revenue trajectory, and exit path. That model is usually well-defined before a founder walks into the room. Richardson has watched founders with strong businesses lose investor interest, not because the opportunity was weak, but because nothing in their presentation aligned with what that specific investor had already decided to back.

The founders who raise efficiently do not arrive hoping the investor will recognize something promising. They do the work beforehand, studying the fund’s thesis, the partner’s recent bets, and what a “yes” actually looks like for that decision-maker. Then they show up looking like that. A warm introduction gets a founder into the room. Preparation is what moves them through the process. The distinction between those two things is where most fundraising momentum gets lost.

The Relationship Is Already Due Diligence

By the time a serious investor writes a check, they have usually been observing the founder for months, sometimes close to a year. How the founder communicates when there is nothing to ask for, how they handle a miss, and whether their numbers hold up over time. Richardson has seen founders get funded not because their pitch was the strongest in the room but because the investor had watched them operate long enough to trust what they saw.

Building relationships before capital is needed rarely produces a negative outcome. Share relevant updates. Do what you say you will do. By the time a raise begins, the relationship should already have some track record. “By the time you’re ready to raise,” Richardson reflects, “your relationship should already have some sort of track record.” Founders who treat investor relationships as transactional, activated only when capital is needed, arrive at the fundraise without the most valuable thing an investor can have: direct evidence of how the founder operates under normal conditions.

Capital Structure Is a Strategic Decision, Not a Closing Detail

The term conversation is not the end of the fundraising process. Founders who treat it that way have already surrendered their leverage. Who takes money from, at what stage, and on what structure shapes every decision that follows: governance, future round dynamics, the investor’s timeline versus the company’s, and the operational reality of managing a capital partner whose interests may or may not align with where the business needs to go.

Richardson has worked with companies that took the first available check and spent the next two years managing a misaligned capital partner, pulling focus from building the business. “The structure of the deal matters as much, and in some cases more, than the deal itself,” he notes. The founders who raise well think about capital structure early, what governance they are willing to give up, what the next round needs to look like, and whether this investor’s timeline matches theirs. Raising capital requires more than hustle. When those elements are in place, capital starts feeling less like something to chase.

Follow Mychal Richardson on LinkedIn or visit Senzu Partners for more insights on capital raising, investor relations, and the strategic decisions that determine whether a raise builds or constrains a business.

Total
0
Shares
Prev
Jon Earl Murphy: How Boards Can Make Clear Cybersecurity Decisions Under Pressure
Jon Earl Murphy

Jon Earl Murphy: How Boards Can Make Clear Cybersecurity Decisions Under Pressure

You May Also Like